Monday, February 08 @ 15:48:04 EST

Dear Treyarch...


First, we took Infinity Ward to task for MW2's shortcomings (which they still haven't addressed). Now it's Treyarch's turn. Giddyup.

Dear Treyarch,

Many people think you suck. They laugh and whizgiggle (click it, or I’ll do it to you) at you for being the spoiled little whipping boy who can barely hold up your end of the CoD duo. I too have been guilty of waving my fleshy parts in your general direction. After all, your debut flopped. CoD3 stunk.

I understand. It was the best game you could make in eight months. Maybe your first time was like mine, more awkward, demeaning and unglamorous than you dreamed it would be. Whatever. All that doesn't really matter. The fact remains that you are responsible for developing the only Call of Duty that sucked. That infamy may linger forever.

But there is hope – a chance to douse yourself with air freshener, to ease the suck. You could prevent the blondes from hee-hawing. If you self prescribe a huge dose of the right stuff, you might even grow truly largest than national.

Now that the new game smell has faded from MW2, some of your work is taking on fresh sparkle. For instance, you included four person cooperative play in your campaign. Coop gave a new way to play the game and added replay value to your title. You gave the choice to play alone to discover the story as you intended. You also gave the choice to turn on the giggle inducing exploding headshot and run through missions with friends. You added some extra fun to the game.

IW, on the other hand, chose to exclude cooperative play from MW2’s campaign under the guise of artistic integrity, or some such idealistic BS. It seems IW is willing to limit a player’s fun to maintain focus on game elements they deem critical to the understanding of their game. The notion we can’t discover art while killing and laughing is short sighted, stupid, and (frankly) condescending. IW must assume gamers, especially adult ones, lack the mental acuity necessary to discover and appreciate a developer’s talents while we’re nipple deep in the throes of head shot induced enjoyment.

I’d also like to give you the recognition you deserve for Spec Ops, the only truly new and unique element in MW2. I know. You’re probably thinking, “Snuphy, you dumb shit. You don’t know what you’re talking about”. Oddly, that’s the same thing I thought when I typed, “Dear Treyarch”. Nonetheless, I babble on.

I know you didn’t actually develop Spec Ops. You made Nazi Zombies. Nazi Zombies was painfully unoriginal. It provided me little replay value to your title. But it succeeded on two counts. First, it added a magical Third Element to your game disk. It was something to keep company with the two standard elements, campaign and multiplayer. It was something new. It was more content. It further embraced cooperative play. Second, IW noticed. IW had to embrace the Third Element, or potentially fall behind you, the developer who is simply in the two year rotation to fill in the gap and earn its masters an extra ski lodge in Aspen. You got IW’s competitive juices flowing. Obviously, they couldn’t just copy your lame zombies. They had to do something bigger and better, something that meshed with the battles, environments and character models encountered throughout the rest of MW2. They succeeded wonderfully. They even made it fun. Thankfully, you started it.

You also added a touch of shine to the dreaded craptastic CoD party system. I’m sure you’ve heard plenty about lobbies and dropped teammates. If you want to hear details, check out the allegedly wise ramblings of 2o2p's ingenious editor. Otherwise, please note that I noticed that you noticed. Your party lobby sucked big time. But it sucked a little less than the impotent system IW created for MW1. You at least tried to improve it to give a better multiplayer experience. I hadn’t given you credit for your efforts. But now that MW2 is out, I certainly should. IW chose to completely ignore the fucked up lobby in making MW2. They also chose to ignore the minor improvements you offered. They simply ported the broken MW1 party system, then opened the safe door so gamers could throw money into it by the truck load.

It looks as if IW is done innovating the CoD series. Even if I give them partial credit for Spec Ops, they brought nothing new or special to the table with MW2. More importantly, they overlooked critical faults in the essential infrastructure of the multiplayer component of their game. It seems as if they are content basking in their current fame and fortune.

In IW’s failures and inadequacies I see opportunity. The door has been opened wide. It’s gaping before you, Treyarch. Inside looks like a cross between an automatic car wash and a bidet. There is cleansing to be had in there that just might wash off some of that CoD3 taint and earn you some respect as a legitimate part of the franchise. To cross the threshold, you absolutely must create a party system that provides a stable lobby and an efficient gateway to multiplayer. The rest should be simple. Cleanse yourself of the tediousness of WWII and create a campaign that is fresh. Stay committed to coop. Adapt the multiplayer to mesh with your campaign. And make the Third Element something fun. This time next year I may still be waving my bare fleshy parts at a CoD developer. If you can successfully complete these tasks, I won’t be waving at you. You would be Mega, dreadfully greater than world, and quite larger than civil. If you can’t, I may be one of the biggest, fattest, proudest whizgigglers around.

Best of luck.

Snuphylupagus.

· More about Site Columns
· News by Drost


Most read story about Site Columns:
Crash of the Q and A

Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Sponsored Links




Reader Comments
COD is Dead to me (Score: 1)
Posted By bunsen27 on Monday, February 08 @ 18:54:57 EST
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
Once again you make me laugh with your wit and humor, but also scare me a little with your constant reference to your man parts.

For me COD MP has been in decline since COD2. COD4 had an excellent SP and innovative MP, but it was still flawed. IW dropped the ball this time around and grabbed all the money people were throwing at them instead. Treyarch has the opportunity to "step up" and give the series back some of it's luster, but I'm not sure they are up to the task. They do however design MP maps MUCH better than IW though.



Untitled (Score: 1)
Posted By Dixon_Tufar on Monday, February 08 @ 21:49:20 EST
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
Fail.



Untitled (Score: 1)
Posted By doodirock on Tuesday, February 09 @ 04:40:22 EST
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
win









Untitled (Score: 1)
Posted By LegendcalledJim on Tuesday, February 09 @ 08:29:42 EST
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
In the end I thought Treyarch had a better game than CoD4. WaW at first was full of flaws, but unlike IW they did their best to support and take care of their problems and the WWII gameplay grew on me. I don't expect Treyarches game to be perfect and I'm sure gamers will find something to bitch about, but if they put in the effort and support they gave WaW it again will be a better game than IW's offering.



I have to agree (Score: 1)
Posted By RogueRedneck on Tuesday, February 09 @ 11:52:31 EST
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
I'm surprised to say it because I had written off Treyarch after some issues I had with W@W and was drinking the IW Kool-Aid. After months of being subjected to the glitchfest that is MW2 and seeing that they ignored the lobby once again, I'm convinced that Treyarch can only be an improvement (I hope...).



W@W (Score: 1)
Posted By SirPoonga on Tuesday, February 09 @ 17:04:31 EST
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
If it wasn't for the fact that it was a WWII game I would say the multiplayer experience for W@W was better than COD4 and is better than MW2. I think WWII is played out.

However, the party system was better. At least the party leader could back out with the party.

I liked Nazi Zombies. It got better as more map packs came out. I can't play the first map because it is so boring compared the the newest one.

Ther eis less glitching in W@W than COD4 or MW2.

The map designs in MW2 and COD4 are better in my opinion. More vertical maps. Most maps in W@W have cover on the edges, large open area in center, with a single point of cover in the center.



Untitled (Score: 1)
Posted By buckeye75 on Wednesday, February 10 @ 02:52:51 EST
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
win



Let us simplify (Score: 1)
Posted By CMA on Wednesday, February 10 @ 10:06:09 EST
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
Simplified:
If the match making lobby system is ≥ Halo 2's lobby system. We will pee our pants with excitement and joy and will long sing your praises.

If you match making lobby system is ≤ the best CoD MM system we will still ridicule you and put your shiny new game on the sale rack.





The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register